Evalution guide for AIOps Tools in your Enterprise

As organizations around the world are moving towards a post-Covid world – one in which
businesses have increasingly moved online and are grappling with maintaining maximum
uptime with reduced ITOM expenditure – we bring to you a guide on what to look for in your
AlOps toolset in 2021 and how preventive healing can help you achieve your ITOM objectives.

AlOps Tools Landscape – Too Many, yet Not Enough

For CTOs and CIOs around the world, a key question to answer in 2021 is how to choose an optimal AlOps toolset for their enterprise. The current landscape is riddled with choices, all vying for being the tool of choice for implementing ITOM in the enterprise. Tool variety and heterogeneity become essential in Hybrid Digital Infrastructure environments, where a single monitoring tool is insufficient to provide visibility and observability across multiple silos.

Many organizations use around 8-10 monitoring tools and are unhappy with their existing operational setup. Regardless of the overwhelming volume of data being collected, insights are still not being processed effectively. Coupled with that is the fact that teams need to frequently contend with alert storms and lack of coherent event correlations and root cause analysis.

Despite the plethora of AlOps tools in the market, most still automate the resolution of incidents that have already occurred through orchestration workflows and ITSM integration as part of the larger automation strategy. Troubleshooting teams still rely on dashboards to become aware of issues via events, logs or alerts. Very often, it is a case of too little, too late.

Downtime is Expensive; Can we Prevent it?

All AlOps tools in the market call themselves proactive; this implies that they use a mix of statistical and analytical techniques to arrive at dynamic thresholds on KPIs (key performance indicators) and can alert when a metric deviates from a threshold. Business rules determine the action that is to be taken when such anomalous behavior occurs – whether it is a notification, a ticketing and orchestration workflow or merely dumping data onto a dashboard.

At the end of the day, all such AlOps tools measure their efficacy in terms of MTTR – Mean Time to Resolve an issue. This still implies that the issue has occurred and has been mitigated/resolved after the fact, and there has been a downtime, however small. Given the fact that enterprises have woken up to the tremendous business impact that even a few minutes’ downtime can have on customer experience, revenue and cost of resolution, organizations adopted a new buzzword in 2020 – negative MTTR. This essentially means resolving an issue before it even occurs.

But is this even possible? And if so, how?

With Preventive Healing solutions, it is. These solutions measure a metric that most AlOps tools do not – the effect of workload on system behavior. This implies that when application workload is not following trends of seasonality (time of day, day of the month, month of the year) or is anomalous with respect to number of requests inbound at a service, there is a cause for concern in terms of the effect it is bound to have on service behavior as well. If models are built to measure and learn this workload-behavior correlation, it is possible to warn ahead of time on an impending issue in an application.

The following section talks about important questions decision-makers in an enterprise need to address, to decide if they are ready to transition to preventive healing.

Checklist

❑ Does the tool alert proactively on events ahead of time?

❑ Does the tool support the creation of orchestration workflows to autonomously remediate issues as soon as they occur?

❑ Does the tool dynamically optimize, throttle or gate/zone workload to prevent failures?

❑ Does the tool prevent workload-related capacity breaches through resource scaring actions?

❑ Does the tool allow for hotspot analysis to determine potential Infrastructure bottlenecks?

Am I ready to transition to Checklist a zero-downtime enterprise?

Ensuring high availability is now critical to business success. However, keeping your business continuously available implies dedicating valuable time and resources to the demanding task of keeping your IT infrastructure up and running 24/7/365. By moving to a preventive healing solution, an enterprise can be equipped to start moving towards a zero-downtime/negative MTTR issue resolution paradigm. This means that an imminent issue can be flagged and automatically remediated using various techniques, some of which include:

  • Dynamically optimizing workload on the fly through tools like Cisco UVOM to reduce the load on the underlying infrastructure,
  • Dynamically optimizing infrastructure in a cloud/microservice/containerized set-up using tools like Istio,
  • Initiating service-centric mechanisms to heal based in time-synchronized contextual data; examples include forcefully terminating a non-essential database query holding onto session locks and preventing subsequent queries from being executed.

These healing mechanisms can be integrated with the underlying ITSM’s orchestration workflows seamlessly through REST interfaces. These empower the enterprise to gradually move from minimal to zero downtime, thereby reducing the costs of running ITOM, maximizing customer delight and helping keep operations centers lean.

Checklist

❑ Does the product support multiple deployment options – SaaS on-premise, cloud and hybrid?

❑ Does the product Ingest from multiple hetorogenous data sources or support such Ingestions via APIs?

❑ How many integrations for ingestion, visualization, notification, and orchestration does it support out-of-the-box?

❑ Is the product standalone or does it depend on other products to be installed for it to work?

Can I achieve more with my existing toolset?

As stated above, when it comes to AlOps tools, leaders would do well to focus on quality rather than quantity. The focus should be on adopting a toolset tailored to the demands of their enterprise – which could include one or all among these: application performance monitoring, infrastructure management, proactive alerting, event correlation, network monitoring and transaction tracing.

If there is a tool catering to a specific requirement not part of this feature set, it is imperative that prior to onboarding it, decision makers should check the number of Integrations that it provides out-of-the-box. Most tools operate in their own distinct space and come with their own native agents for data collection, or use data ingested by other APM/AlOps tools via REST APIs. They also provide API-based integrations with ITSM systems (like ServiceNow) and visualization/notification mechanisms (like Slack or Grafana). These integrations are Important to protect existing organizational investments In the ITOM setup and still make the best of what these niche tools have to offer.

Checklist

❑ Does the tool provide event correlations and prevent alert storms and false positives?

❑ Does the tool display probable root causes with application topology, timeline of the incident and all service-related contextual information in a single pane of glass?

❑ Does the tool support extraction of time-synchronized context to troubleshoot. Including logs, code traces, database statistics, configuration change tracking and forensics?

❑ Does the tool provide a picture of business transactions even when they flow across multiple organizational silos?

Can I minimize operational costs while reducing downtime Checklist and MTTR?

Despite preventive healing and efforts to move toward a zero-downtime enterprise, some Issues may slip through the cracks particularly when they are unrelated to workload and are caused by external factors like disk crashes, erroneous code, poorly designed queries, or wrongly configured services. In such scenarios, the focus shifts to minimizing the MTTR and reducing downtime as far as possible, to prevent customer experience from getting affected.

Root Cause Analysis enables ITOM teams to pinpoint the cause of any incident and address it given all information at hand. An AlOps solution which provides contextual, timely, relevant, and accurate information on the state of the application in a concise, intuitive fashion so teams can perform event correlation and analysis effectively, is the need of the hour. In ITOM parlance, such dashboards with all service information and event correlations presented in a unified view are called a “single pane of glass.”

Service data pertinent to an issue which is extracted at the time of an anomalous event can have multiple dimensions. all of which need to be analyzed before root cause can be arrived at. Some examples of this data include logs, code traces, query level database statistics, configuration changes and diagnostic data called forensics, which tells us more about the state of the service at the time of the incident.

Checklist

❑ Does the tool allow for projected workload trends over a period ranging from months to a few years to be correlated with the corresponding infrastructure requirements?

❑ Does such a what-if analysis cover only linear parameters like CPU, or additional critical parameters like memory, disk space and configurations like connection pool sizes and active thread counts on an application server?

❑ Does such an analytic uncover current and future hotspots In the application?

❑ Does the analysis highlight under-provisioned services and suggest ways and means to scale them up?

❑ Does the analysis highlight overprovisioned services and suggest how to optimize them, and also mention the cost savings resulting thereof?

Can I optimize infrastructure investments while scaling intelligently and effectively

Helping a business make intelligent scaling choices is an essential ingredient in its success. To plan for future workloads, your AlOps solution needs to be able to correlate projected workload trends to corresponding infrastructure requirements. In doing so, it Is important to not only highlight under-provisioned resources that need to be scaled up. but also oyerproyisioned ones that are a drain on your business spends and need to be scaled back. Running a what-if analysis on projected workload to examine corresponding capacity forecasts is a critical step in this process.

Your Journey To Preventive Healing Begins With HEAL

HEAL is the industry’s first preventive healing software for IT that can help IT problems before they happen. By applying a patented ML technique called workload-behavior correlation, HEAL can highlight anomalies in system behavior as a function of the current workload, called early warning signals. Such an advanced alerting mechanism, coupled with contextual data on the state of the system at the time of the anomaly, allows you the time to put in place the required measures to prevent the issue.

What makes HEAL unique

  • Complete preventive solution for enterprise
  • Autonomous healing to rectify issues, and enable ticketless monitoring
  • Entire operating context of user journey, application and system in a single pane of glass
  • Situational awareness that can precisely pinpoint root causes